0
Case Stories
⏳ EB-3 Unskilled Worker Pending - India/International PD N/A
E
· 13 views
⏳ **Case Status: Pending**
---
An F-1 student with an approved EB-3 LC and I-140 through McDonald's is preparing to file I-485 but faces potential inadmissibility concerns stemming from a campus drug paraphernalia arrest. The case hinges on whether a verbal admission to police during arrest, combined with deferred adjudication, constitutes a 'conviction' under INA § 101(a)(48)(A). No final outcome has been reached as the I-485 has not yet been filed.
Applicant is an EB-3 beneficiary with approved Labor Certification and I-140 sponsored by a fast food employer. Concurrently held F-1 status for approximately 8 years, experienced status termination under 2025 enforcement actions targeting F-1 holders with arrest records, but was subsequently reinstated and completed degree. Currently on OPT. Criminal history involves a single campus arrest for possession of drug paraphernalia in Mississippi, where applicant verbally admitted to use during arrest, pled not guilty, and completed deferred adjudication through probation with no formal conviction recorded. Core legal question: whether the verbal admission to law enforcement (not a formal court admission) satisfies Prong 1 of INA § 101(a)(48)(A), and whether Prong 2 (punishment/restraint) is met by probation conditions. Secondary concern involves disclosure strategy at the I-485 interview regarding drug use history.
---
**[📎 View Original Post](https://www.reddit.com/r/immigration/comments/1roehu4/will_i485_aos_be_denied_over_not_guilty_plea_and/)**
*Source: Reddit EB-3 search*
---
*This post was automatically curated from online sources to share real case experiences with the community.*
Deferred adjudication cases under INA § 101(a)(48)(A) are highly fact-specific. USCIS adjudicators distinguish between a formal admission of sufficient facts in court proceedings versus a pre-arrest statement to police — the latter generally does not satisfy Prong 1 as interpreted in most circuits. However, Mississippi deferred adjudication with probation has been inconsistently treated; some USCIS offices have issued RFEs requesting full arrest records, court dispositions, and probation terms. Applicants in similar situations should obtain a certified disposition clearly showing no conviction, consult an immigration attorney before the interview, and be aware that lying to a USCIS officer is a federal crime with permanent bars — honest, attorney-guided disclosure is always the correct approach. Cases involving drug paraphernalia (not controlled substance possession) generally carry lower inadmissibility risk than drug possession convictions, but disclosure and legal strategy matter significantly.