❌ EB-3 Skilled Worker I-140 Denied - Priority Date Retention on Refile

❌ **Case Status: Denied** --- An employer-sponsored EB-3 I-140 was denied due to missing company tax returns, a procedural omission rather than a substantive eligibility issue. The petitioner and employer now have the required financial evidence and are attempting to refile, seeking to retain the original PERM priority date. The refile effort is being blocked at the USCIS lockbox intake stage before reaching an adjudicator. An EB-3 I-140 petition was denied after USCIS found that required financial evidence — specifically, company tax returns demonstrating the employer's ability to pay the proffered wage — was omitted from the filing. With the tax returns now available, the employer is pursuing a new I-140 and asserting that the original PERM priority date should be preserved, as the PERM was valid at the time of the original petition filing. The case involves a compounding procedural issue: the refiled I-140 is being rejected at the USCIS lockbox during intake processing, meaning it never reaches an adjudicator for review. The petitioner is seeking specialized counsel experienced with all three issues: refiled I-140s after financial evidence denials, priority date retention arguments, and lockbox submission barriers. --- **[📎 View Original Post](https://www.reddit.com/r/immigration/comments/1uhldep/looking_for_an_attorney_experienced_with_refiled/)** *Source: Reddit EB-3 search* --- *This post was automatically curated from online sources to share real case experiences with the community.*