USCIS has placed a blanket hold on applications from nationals of 39 countries. Critics argue this delays—not improves—vetting, as no additional review occurs during the hold period.
USCIS recently implemented a blanket hold on immigration applications filed by nationals from 39 countries. While the stated justification centers on stricter vetting procedures, immigration advocates and applicants are pushing back on the effectiveness of this approach. Opponents of the policy argue that a blanket hold fundamentally misunderstands how vetting works. A hold does not trigger additional scrutiny or review—it simply freezes adjudication indefinitely. In practice, adjudication officers may actually deprioritize these held cases precisely because approvals are blocked regardless of case merit. For EB-3 applicants from the affected countries, this means applications may sit untouched in a queue without any active case work being performed. The hold creates administrative delay without producing the enhanced security review that the policy ostensibly targets. The policy has drawn significant criticism from the immigration community for conflating delay with diligence.
A former USCIS Asylum Officer and ICE law clerk, now in private practice, hosts an AMA covering marriage-based green cards and K-1 fiancé visas, offering insider perspective on current risks and procedures.
USCIS extended TPS-related EAD expiration dates to July 10, 2026 for nationals of Haiti, Burma, Somalia, Yemen, Syria, Ethiopia, and South Sudan following the Supreme Court's Mullins v. Doe ruling affirming DHS's authority to terminate TPS designations.
USCIS proposes major AR-11 changes requiring employer and benefits data from foreign nationals reporting address changes. Inconsistencies with visa petitions could trigger reviews. Public comment period closes July 6, 2026.