USCIS has placed a blanket hold on applications from nationals of 39 countries. Critics argue this delays—not improves—vetting, as no additional review occurs during the hold period.
USCIS recently implemented a blanket hold on immigration applications filed by nationals from 39 countries. While the stated justification centers on stricter vetting procedures, immigration advocates and applicants are pushing back on the effectiveness of this approach. Opponents of the policy argue that a blanket hold fundamentally misunderstands how vetting works. A hold does not trigger additional scrutiny or review—it simply freezes adjudication indefinitely. In practice, adjudication officers may actually deprioritize these held cases precisely because approvals are blocked regardless of case merit. For EB-3 applicants from the affected countries, this means applications may sit untouched in a queue without any active case work being performed. The hold creates administrative delay without producing the enhanced security review that the policy ostensibly targets. The policy has drawn significant criticism from the immigration community for conflating delay with diligence.
Starting July 10, 2026, USCIS will reject or deny immigration applications with invalid or improperly signed forms, affecting H1B, Green Card, and other petitions.
USCIS received only 211,600 H-1B registrations for FY2027, a significant drop from prior years. The agency now prioritizes advanced-degree and high-salary applicants, with 71.5% of selectees holding U.S. master's degrees or higher.
USCIS reports H-1B FY2027 registrations fell to 211,600 — a 38.5% drop from FY2026 and 72% below the FY2024 peak of 759K. The fixed 85,000 cap means fewer registrants translates to higher selection odds.