USCIS Fee Hike Ruled Unlawful: EB-5 Investors Sue for Refunds in 2026
EB-5 investors have filed a lawsuit against USCIS seeking fee refunds after a court ruled the agency's fee increase was unlawful. The case raises broader questions about USCIS fee-setting authority affecting all employment-based applicants.
A group of EB-5 investors has filed a lawsuit against U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) demanding refunds of filing fees paid under a fee schedule that a federal court has since ruled unlawful. The legal challenge follows a judicial determination that USCIS exceeded its authority when it implemented a significant fee hike, opening the door for affected petitioners to seek restitution.
The fee increase in question was part of a broader USCIS restructuring of its fee schedule, which raised costs substantially across multiple visa categories. For EB-5 investors, who are required to make substantial capital investments in U.S. enterprises in exchange for lawful permanent residence, the additional fees represented a significant financial burden on top of already considerable investment thresholds.
The court's ruling that the fee hike was unlawful marks an important precedent for all employment-based immigration applicants, including those in the EB-3 category. If USCIS is found to have improperly collected fees, it could set a legal standard limiting the agency's discretion in unilaterally raising filing costs without proper regulatory procedures, such as notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act.
For EB-3 applicants and sponsors tracking USCIS costs in 2026, this case is worth monitoring. A favorable ruling for the plaintiffs could result in fee rollbacks or tighter constraints on future USCIS fee increases across all employment-based categories. Applicants who paid fees under the challenged schedule may wish to consult with an immigration attorney about their eligibility for any potential refund claims.
USCIS now has full access to applicants' immigration history across agencies, including DS-160 forms and CBP records. Inconsistencies in prior filings can trigger misrepresentation findings under INA § 212(a)(6)(C)(i), jeopardizing green card and EB-3 petitions.
USCIS issued a May 22, 2026 Policy Memorandum reframing Adjustment of Status as 'extraordinary relief,' signaling stricter scrutiny for green card applicants inside the U.S. USCIS partially walked back the memo a week later, leaving significant uncertainty.
USCIS proposed expanding Form AR-11 to require foreign nationals to disclose employer information when reporting address changes, raising compliance and enforcement risks for sponsoring employers.