USCIS Ends Holds & EB-3 April 2026 Visa Bulletin Update: DOL Prevailing Wage Rule Changes
USCIS has ended holds on certain immigration cases while DOL's prevailing wage rule introduces new cost implications for H-1B and employment-based petitions. EB-5 trendlines also show shifting investor immigration patterns in April 2026.
Immigration Daily's April 9 issue highlights several significant developments affecting employment-based immigration applicants. Chief among them is USCIS's decision to end holds on pending cases, a move that could accelerate adjudications for EB-3 and other employment-based preference categories that have been waiting in administrative queues. The Department of Labor's prevailing wage rule has received a new price tag, with updated guidance redefining compensation thresholds for H-1B and PERM labor certification filings. This change directly impacts EB-3 petitioners and their sponsoring employers, as prevailing wage determinations form the foundation of the PERM process required for most EB-3 green card applications. EB-5 investor immigration continues to show evolving trendlines in early 2026, reflecting shifts in regional center activity, investment thresholds, and demand from various source countries. While EB-5 is a separate preference category from EB-3, macroeconomic trends in investor visas often signal broader employment-based immigration policy directions. For EB-3 applicants, the end of USCIS holds is particularly noteworthy, as it may reduce wait times for I-140 approvals and associated adjustment of status filings.
A new USCIS memo is causing widespread panic among immigrants, but analysts argue the policy's chilling effect may already be its true goal. Cases vary individually and are not automatically terminated.
A former USCIS officer and supervisor offers an insider analysis of the new AOS policy memo, clarifying what the directive actually requires versus widespread misconceptions circulating online.
A new USCIS memorandum dated May 22, 2026 appears to alter the Adjustment of Status standard, potentially conflicting with the BIA precedent Matter of Cavazos and forcing some applicants toward consular processing.