USCISCyrus Mehta · 3 min read

Green Card Alert: Indian LL.B Downgrade Triggers USCIS RFEs for EB-2 Lawyer Sponsorships

AACRAO EDGE reclassified India's LLB degree as bachelor's-equivalent instead of JD-equivalent, prompting USCIS to issue RFEs in EB-2 green card cases for Indian-trained lawyers. Petitioners may still qualify via 5 years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.

· Source: Cyrus Mehta
A significant credential evaluation shift is causing disruptions for Indian-trained lawyers pursuing employment-based second preference (EB-2) green cards. Around 2022, AACRAO EDGE updated its guidance to classify India's Bachelor of Laws (LLB) as comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree rather than a first professional law degree (JD). Because USCIS officers frequently consult EDGE when evaluating foreign credentials, this change has led to a wave of I-140 Requests for Evidence targeting the educational qualifications of Indian lawyer beneficiaries. The EDGE entry acknowledges that the LLB 'functions as a first professional degree in law in India,' but stops short of calling it equivalent to a U.S. JD. This contrasts with EDGE's treatment of the Indian MBBS, which it directly classifies as comparable to a U.S. first professional degree in medicine. The inconsistency leaves LLB holders in a weaker position and makes straightforward JD-equivalence arguments unlikely to succeed on their own. Despite the reclassification, a viable legal pathway remains under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k). Where a foreign degree is found equivalent only to a U.S. bachelor's degree, USCIS regulations allow petitioners to satisfy the EB-2 advanced degree requirement by documenting at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty. 'Progressive' here means increasing responsibility, complexity, and judgment — not merely additional years in the same role. Practitioners advise that EB-2 petitions for Indian lawyers should be carefully reframed around this experience-based pathway rather than relying solely on credential equivalence arguments. The job requirements and the beneficiary's career trajectory must be clearly documented to reflect the escalating nature of the work. While this issue directly affects EB-2 filings, it is a reminder for all employment-based applicants of how third-party credential evaluation bodies can reshape USCIS adjudications. Indian nationals across EB preference categories should monitor their credential evaluations and work with attorneys to ensure petitions are framed to withstand evolving agency scrutiny.

Related Articles