EB-5 Investment Green Card: AILA Urges USCIS to Expedite AOS Before Grandfathering Deadline
AILA has formally requested USCIS to accelerate processing of EB-5 Adjustment of Status applications for investors who qualify under grandfathering provisions before a critical deadline passes.
The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) has formally urged U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to prioritize the adjudication of EB-5 Adjustment of Status applications for investors who fall under the grandfathering provisions established by the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022. AILA's request comes as the deadline for grandfathered applicants to benefit from prior program rules approaches, creating urgency for thousands of pending petitioners.
Under the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022, Congress restructured the investor visa program significantly, but included grandfathering protections for investors who had filed I-526 petitions under the old framework. These grandfathered applicants were promised continuity under the rules that applied when they originally invested, but lengthy USCIS processing backlogs have put many at risk of missing the cutoff to use those protections.
AILA's advocacy highlights a systemic concern: if USCIS does not act swiftly to adjudicate these AOS applications, eligible investors may lose their grandfathered status through no fault of their own. The association is calling for dedicated processing tracks and prioritization mechanisms to ensure fairness for this cohort of applicants.
While this development primarily concerns EB-5 investor visa holders, it signals broader USCIS capacity and backlog challenges that affect all employment-based green card categories, including EB-3. Delays and procedural bottlenecks in one visa category often reflect system-wide adjudication pressures that EB-3 applicants should monitor as they plan their own timelines.
USCIS has confirmed that TPS beneficiaries from Sudan and Ukraine retain valid work authorization while the agency issues further guidance amid ongoing policy changes.
A Nebraska federal court in Agarwal v. Miller declined to follow Mukherji v. Miller, creating a direct district court split over USCIS's two-step 'final merits determination' framework for EB-1A extraordinary ability petitions. The conflict raises key questions about agency interpretive authority after Loper Bright.
A former DHS/USCIS Asylum Officer and ICE law clerk turned immigration attorney hosted an AMA on expedite requests, work permit gaps, and strategies for stuck cases, offering rare insider perspective on agency decision-making.