PolicyJDSupra Immigration · 3 min read

Adjustment Of Status Blocked EB-3 2026: USCIS Memorandum Tightens Green Card Scrutiny

USCIS issued a May 2026 policy memo reinforcing that adjustment of status is discretionary, not a right. Officers must now weigh negative factors like overstays and unlawful status more heavily, increasing denial risk for EB-3 applicants with complex histories.

· Source: JDSupra Immigration
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released a new policy memorandum in May 2026 reaffirming that adjustment of status (AOS) — the process of obtaining a green card while remaining inside the United States — is a discretionary benefit, not a guaranteed right. The memo characterizes AOS as an "extraordinary" exception to the standard consular processing route and signals that officers will apply more rigorous scrutiny to every pending and future application. The memorandum instructs USCIS officers to conduct a totality-of-the-circumstances review for every AOS case. Factors that may weigh against approval include status violations such as overstays, unauthorized employment, failure to maintain lawful status, misrepresentation or fraud, and the choice to remain in the U.S. rather than pursue consular processing abroad. The memo notably states that most AOS applicants "usually fail to maintain their nonimmigrant or parole status" while their applications are pending, signaling heightened skepticism from adjudicators. Positive factors that can offset negatives include long-term lawful U.S. residence, stable employment and finances, U.S. family ties, humanitarian considerations, and demonstrated good moral character. Additional positive equities listed in the USCIS Policy Manual — such as tax compliance, community service, and U.S.-based education — can also be cited, but the memo makes clear that positive factors must collectively outweigh negative ones for approval. For EB-3 applicants specifically, this memo has significant implications. Because EB-3 workers often spend years on H-2B, H-1B, or other temporary visas before a visa number becomes available, any gaps in status or periods of unauthorized employment could now be weighted more heavily against them during adjudication. Applicants with complex immigration histories should consult an attorney immediately to assess their risk profile and consider whether consular processing may be a strategically safer alternative. Importantly, the memo applies retroactively to all currently pending I-485 applications, not just new filings. Applicants should proactively gather strong documentary evidence of positive equities — employment records, tax returns, family declarations, and proof of continuous lawful status — and be prepared for more detailed discretionary analysis rather than a straightforward eligibility determination.

Related Articles