AC21 Portability 2026: Should You File I-485 Supplement J Proactively or Wait for RFE?
Murthy Law addresses a common question for EB-3 applicants: whether to proactively submit Form I-485 Supplement J when invoking AC21 portability after 180+ days of pending I-485, or wait for a USCIS RFE.
For employment-based green card applicants whose I-485 has been pending for more than 180 days, AC21 portability offers a critical safety net when changing employers. AC21 (American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act) allows applicants to move to a same or similar occupational classification without jeopardizing their pending adjustment of status application. The central question addressed in this Murthy Law Q&A is whether applicants should proactively file Form I-485 Supplement J when invoking AC21 portability, or wait until USCIS issues a Request for Evidence (RFE). This is a nuanced procedural decision that can significantly impact the outcome of an adjustment of status application. Generally, USCIS regulations and policy guidance allow applicants to submit Supplement J either proactively or in response to an RFE. Proactive submission can help establish a clear record of the employer change and demonstrate eligibility under AC21 before any questions arise from an adjudicator, potentially streamlining the review process. For EB-3 applicants navigating this decision, the key considerations include the similarity between old and new job duties, the timing of the employer change relative to the 180-day threshold, and whether the new position falls within the same occupational classification. Documentation of the new position's duties and salary should be prepared regardless of the submission strategy chosen.
USCIS releases a memo FAQ addressing key processing changes, while ICE faces scrutiny over lack of transparency in detention center operations. Both developments have implications for green card applicants in 2026.
USCIS Policy Memo PM-602-0199 (May 21, 2026) reframes Adjustment of Status as 'extraordinary relief,' raising scrutiny for in-country filers and favoring consular processing abroad—especially for F-1, J-1, and B visa holders.
USCIS is scrutinizing EB-1 and O-1 petitions more closely as formulaic, AI-generated, and potentially manufactured evidence becomes widespread. Immigration attorney Cyrus Mehta warns that crowdsourced strategies and staged credentials undermine petition credibility.